Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung Disability and International Development - Inklusion in der Humanitären Hilfe und Katastrophenvorsorge ...
←
→
Transkription von Seiteninhalten
Wenn Ihr Browser die Seite nicht korrekt rendert, bitte, lesen Sie den Inhalt der Seite unten
26. JAHRGANG AUSGABE 1/2015 26ND YEAR ISSUE 1/2015 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung Disability and International Development Inklusion in der Humanitären Hilfe und Katastrophenvorsorge Inclusion in Humantarian Aid and Disaster Risk Reduction
Inhaltsverzeichnis Impressum/Masthead Table of Contents Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung Disability and International Development Herausgeber/Editor Behinderung und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit e.V./ Disability and Development Cooperation Anschrift/Address Wandastr. 9, 45136 Essen Editorial .......................................................................3 Tel.: +49 (0)201/17 89 123 Fax: +49 (0)201/17 89 026 E-Mail: info@inie-inid.org Schwerpunkt/Focus Internet: www.zbdw.de Inklusion in der Humanitären Hilfe und Katastrophenvor sorge/Inclusion in Humantarian Aid and Disaster Risk Re Für blinde und sehbehinderte Menschen ist die Zeit duction schrift im Internet erhältlich./For persons with visual im pairment, an electronic version of the journal is Disability Inclusive Humanitarian Action and Disaster Risk available at www.zbdw.de Reduction: A Story of Successes and Ongoing Challenges Redaktionsgruppe/Editorial Board Valerie Scherrer ..............................................................4 Isabella Bertmann, Christine Bruker, Jana Offergeld, UNHCR’s Experience in Strengthening Protection of Prof. Dr. Sabine Schäper, Gabriele Weigt Persons with Disabilities in Forced Displacement Schriftleitung/Editorship Kirstin Lange.................................................................10 Gabriele Weigt Redaktionsassistenz/Editorial Assistance Emergency Wheelchair Services Katharina Silter Lucie Pannell/Sarah Sheldon/Tamsin Langford ...............15 Gestaltung/Layout Amund Schmidt The Route to Disability Inclusive Humanitarian Aid: Druck/Print Experience From the Field Anne Ernst ....................................................................20 Druckerei Nolte, Iserlohn Bankverbindung/Bank Details Bank für Sozialwirtschaft BIC: BFSWDE33XXX IBAN: DE19 3702 0500 0008 0407 02 Berichte/Reports ........................................................26 Die Zeitschrift Behinderung und internationale Entwick lung ist eine Pubilikation des Instituts für inklusive Ent wicklung. Das Institut wird getragen von Behinderung Kurzmeldungen/Notes..............................................30 und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit e.V. The journal Disability and International Development is a publication of the Institute for Inclusive Development. The Institut ist part of Disability and Development Cao Literatur/Reviews .....................................................36 peration. Hinweis: Für den Inhalt der Artikel sind die AutorInnen verantwortlich. Veröffentlichte Artikel stellen nicht un Veranstaltungen/Events............................................42 bedingt die Meinung der Redaktion dar. Die Veröffentli chung von Beiträgen aus der Zeitschrift in anderen Pub likationen ist möglich, wenn dies unter vollständiger Quellenangabe geschieht und ein Belegexemplar über sandt wird. Please note that the authors are responsible for the content of the articles. Published articles do not neces sarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board. Papers published in the journal Disability and International De velopment may be reprinted in other publications if cor rectly cited and if a copy is forwarded to the contact provided above. ISSN 2191-6888 (Print) ISSN 2199-7306 (Internet) 2 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
EDITORIAL Editorial Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Dear Readers, im Jahr 2014 waren mehr als 50 Millionen Menschen in 2014, more than 50 million people were dis auf der Flucht, so viele, wie seit dem zweiten Welt placed, a number of refugees that has not been krieg nicht mehr. Ursache der Fluchtbewegungen sind seen since World War II. The massive refugee move die vielen kriegerischen Auseinandersetzungen welt ments have been caused by the high number of weit, aber auch Naturkatastrophen. Humanitäre Not armed conflicts worldwide as well as natural disas situationen betreffen alle Menschen. Menschen mit ters. Humanitarian disasters affect all people. How Behinderung sind jedoch in Notsituationen besonders ever, persons with disabilities face disproportionate gefährdet und werden immer noch von vielen Hilfs risks in disaster situations and are often excluded maßnahmen ausgeschlossen. from relief and rehabilitation processes. Die Beiträge in diesem Heft zeigen, dass die UN The articles in this issue show that the UN Con Konvention über die Rechte von Menschen mit Behin vention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities derung auch in der Humanitären Hilfe und der Kata contribute to increase awareness of national and in strophenvorsorge dazu beiträgt, das Bewusstsein der ternational stakeholders on the rights of persons nationalen und internationalen Akteure für das Recht with disabilities to be included in humanitarian re auf Inklusion zu stärken. sponse and disaster risk reduction. In 2006, the Eine erste Bestandsaufnahme zur Inklusion von journal Disability and Development already pub Menschen mit Behinderung in die Humanitäre Hilfe lished an issue focusing on inclusion of persons with machte die Zeitschrift Behinderung und internationale disabilities in emergency response. Much has hap Entwicklung bereits im Jahr 2006. Seitdem hat sich viel pened since then: The article by Valerie Scherrer getan. Der Beitrag von Valerie Scherrer gibt einen Über gives an overview of main developments in the past blick über die Entwicklungen in den letzten Jahren. few years. Auf internationaler Bühne haben sich Menschen On the international stage, persons with disabili mit Behinderung erfolgreich bei der dritten Weltkon ties successfully participated at the third World Con ferenz der Vereinten Nationen zur Risikoreduzierung ference on Disaster Risk Reduction in Sendai, Japan. von Katastrophen (März 2015) im japanischen Sendai Inclusion of persons with disabilities is well embed eingebracht. Das Thema Inklusion ist fest in dem neu ded in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Re en weltweiten Aktionsplan zur Risikoreduzierung ver duction 2015 - 2030. Please refer to the article writ ankert. Lesen Sie dazu den Beitrag von Martin Kunst ten by Martin Kunstmann, who also introduces the mann, der sich zudem einem innovativen Netzwerk Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Network der Katastrophenvorsorge widmet. Auch wichtige Or (DiDRRN). Furthermore, important UN organisations ganisationen der Vereinten Nationen, wie UNHCR such as UNHCR (United Nations High Commis (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), er sioner for Refugees) are on their way to develop ap arbeiten Ansätze für ihre Arbeit, um Menschen mit proaches to include persons with disabilities in hu Behinderung angemessen zu berücksichtigen. Lesen manitarian response, as described by Kirstin Lange. Sie dazu den Beitrag von Kirstin Lange. As part of its quality management, the German In Deutschland entwickelt das Auswärtige Amt im Federal Foreign Office also enhances its efforts to Rahmen seiner Qualitätsentwicklung Ansätze, wie vul take into account the needs of vulnerable groups in nerable Gruppen aktiv in die Humanitäre Hilfe einbe humanitarian action. The inclusion of persons with zogen werden können und nimmt entsprechend auch disabilities is seen as an important aspect of good Menschen mit Behinderung verstärkt in den Blick. Der humanitarian practice. Anne Ernst provides an in Beitrag von Anne Ernst beschreibt, wie die Forderung sight how the inclusion of persons with disabilities is nach Inklusion von Menschen mit Behinderung in der put into practice in the daily work of a humanitarian praktischen Arbeit einer Humanitären Hilfsorganisati organisation and describes main challenges to be on umgesetzt wird und welche Herausforderungen es met. Finally, Lucie Pannell's article focuses on the zu bewältigen gibt. Lucie Pannells Beitrag lenkt specific needs of persons with disabilities in disaster schließlich das Augenmerk darauf, dass auch die spe situations that need to be addressed. zifischen Bedarfe von Menschen mit Behinderung in The editorial board would like to thank Anne einer Notsituation berücksichtigt werden müssen. Ernst, consultant for disability issues at Johanniter Die Redaktionsgruppe bedankt sich sehr für das International Assistance, who supported the prepa Engagement von Anne Ernst, Fachberaterin für Behin ration of this issue. derung der Johanniter Auslandshilfe, die diese Aus gabe mit gestaltet hat. We wish you an inspiring reading. Your editorial board. Wir wünschen Ihnen eine interessante Lektüre. Ihre Redaktionsgruppe Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 3 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE Disability Inclusive Humanitarian Action and Disaster Risk Reduction: A Story of Successes and Ongoing Challenges Valerie Scherrer In the past ten years, awareness about disability has increased among development organisations, however it took longer to open the eyes of the humanitarian sector including for the development of strategies re lated to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). However immense shift of understanding and project implementation have happened within the past five years with many organisations realising that they were missing out 15% of affected population in their emergency responses or while planning. The article will explain some of the reasons for the shift and still existing barriers to a full inclusion of disability issues in emergency and disaster risk reduction. Introduction large num The World report on disability published in bers of re 2011 by the World Health Organisation and spondents in the World Bank (WHO 2011) suggests that 15% the Americas of the population (1 billion) live with disabili and Asia. The ties. Persons with disabilities generally are af survey high fected by poorer health conditions, lower edu lighted that cation achievements, fewer economic opportu 71% of par nities and higher rates of poverty than persons ticipants have without disabilities. In these circumstances the no personal risks faced by persons with disabilities, their preparedness family and communities regarding disaster is plan and higher than for the general population. most of them I’ve been working in the field of disability are not and development/humanitarian action since aware of dis 1997 starting in long standing Burmese refugee aster risk re camps in Thailand and then being involved in duction plans. all major disasters and crisis around the world It is important to mention that the Hyogo trying to include and address needs of persons framework for action 2005 -2015 (UN 2007) with disabilities in humanitarian responses. I’ve did not consider disability but only mentioned witnessed enormous changes in how main the need to promote the implementation of so stream humanitarian organisations consider cial safety nets to be developed to support per persons with disabilities in their operations. At sons with disabilities as means to decrease un the start of my involvement in this sector, main derlying risk factors (priority 4). In contrast, the stream organisations seldom included persons recently adopted Sendai Framework for Disaster with disabilities; humanitarian workers did not Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (UNISDR 2015) is pay attention to disability. They were sometimes one of the most inclusive mainstream docu made aware through the large number of in ments ever endorsed by 187 States. It considers jured people in need of medical care and therefore looked at persons with disabilities as passive victims requir ing specific medical care but not as members of the affected community having capacities. In 2013, the United Nation Inter national Strategy for Disaster Reduc tion conducted a survey on disaster risk reduction and persons with dis abilities in order to understand the challenges they face. More than 5’400 persons with disabilities re sponded to the survey worldwide with 4 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE persons with disabilities as one of the key ac interventions covering large populations. It is tors and partners contributing to increase resil also unlikely that persons with disabilities ac ience of nations and communities. It also in cess the information about distribution sites and cludes strong references to accessibility and goods. If they do access, the risk of mistreat universal design taking an important step to ment is high, as they often need support to wards an inclusive society. This is a clear sign bring goods back home and will have to pay for that disability isn’t invisible any more! the services. Barriers Faced by Persons with Summary of Barriers Faced by Persons with Disabilities Disabilities Attitudinal: According to the definition of the UN conven - Negative perception of disabilities based on tion on the rights of persons with disabilities, religious or cultural believes and community “Persons with disabilities include those who understanding of causes of disabilities. have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or - Humanitarian actors involved in emergency sensory impairments which in interaction with response believe that specific expertise is various barriers may hinder their full and effec necessary to meet the needs of persons with tive participation in society on an equal basis disabilities and often forget that their pri with others” (UN 2006). The above statement mary needs such as food, shelter, water, etc. highlights that disability is strongly linked with are the same as for anybody else. environmental barriers that are present in so - Persons with disabilities themselves often cieties. Those barriers may for example be atti lack confidence and self-esteem to claim for tudes, insufficient accessibility of infrastructure, their rights and contribute to emergency re communication and information, political dis sponses or disaster risk reduction programs. crimination and economic disadvantage. In Dis Communication/information: aster Risk Reduction programs some key actions - Information about emergency responses of are related to establishing early warning sys ten is provided in inaccessible format that tems that will ensure appropriate information cuts off persons with disabilities to access about hazard risks so that people are able to them. protect their assets on time and to evacuate - Information often is disclosed only in one or when necessary. Those early warning systems two formats (written, audio) making it diffi are based on the capacity of people to under cult for persons with sensory or intellectual stand them and on an efficient information sys disabilities to understand them and act ac tem. Often the early warning messages are cordingly. given through media or loudspeaker, inaccessi - Feedback and complains mechanisms are ble to people with hearing impairments or to set up through mobile phone, written forms older people. Persons with intellectual disabili or focus group discussions that often exclude ties may have difficulties in understanding or persons with disabilities. construing the message so that they know what Infrastructure/accessibility: to do to seek protection, especially when not - Emergencies are not discriminative and often accompanied. happen in complex context where existing Other courses of action are related to com infrastructures such as shelters, health serv munity mapping looking at identifying vulner ices, etc. are not physically accessible. abilities and capacities of the community in or - Persons with disabilities often can’t use exist der to define evacuation plans, emergency ing shelters as facilities such as latrines and shelters and supplies. Often the mapping is bath areas are not usable by them. done through community meetings that persons - Approaches such as cash distribution with mobility or hearing impairment are unable through vouchers or food/cash for work are to attend. Furthermore, negative perceptions of not planned in order to provide opportuni disability lead family members to protect or ties to persons with disabilities to benefit hide persons with disabilities making them in from them. visible in the mapping exercise and putting These obstacles are just a summary of some their life at higher risk. of the existing barriers; those are often exacer In humanitarian responses and especially in bated by a crisis or a disaster. The built environ a first phase, distribution is done at a central ment may be destroyed or change through dis point that often is not accessible. Furthermore placements and therefore further limits the mo rapid needs assessment does not look at spe bility of persons with disabilities. Social network cific household composition but define broad support may be disrupted either because social Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 5 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE and health services are not functioning any is since then implemented1. The clusters have more or because of loss of family/community enhanced the exchange of information but also members. Usual communication means may be provided a space and forum to highlight gaps disrupted and therefore hinder capacity of peo within the humanitarian responses. The Inter- ple to access information. Agency Standing Committee’s Transformative Agenda1 also has provided guidance on local Elements That Facilitate Changes leadership in emergency response and stronger implementation of accountability mechanisms. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons It provides a greater voice to people affected by with Disabilities (UNCRPD) crisis or disasters and has facilitated the contri In 2006, the United Nation Convention on the bution of organisations of persons with disabili Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) was ties in the implementation and coordination of adopted and put forward for signatures, ratifi relief activities. cation and implementation. The UNCRPD pro At the same time the humanitarian sectors vides disability stakeholders a great instrument recognised the need to better link emergency to advocate for the rights of persons with dis responses with development and set up an abilities but also to hold states accountable to early recovery cluster. Early Recovery is defined implement it. as recovery that begins early in a humanitarian - Article 11 UNCRPD - Situations of risk and setting. It is a multi-dimensional process, humanitarian emergencies: States Parties guided by development principles. It aims to shall take, in accordance with their obliga generate self-sustaining and nationally owned tions under international law, including inter resilient processes for post-crisis recovery. Early national humanitarian law and international recovery encompasses the restoration of basic human rights law, all necessary measures to services, livelihoods, shelter, governance, secu ensure the protection and safety of persons rity and the rule of law, environment and social with disabilities in situations of risk, including dimensions, including the reintegration of dis situations of armed conflict, humanitarian placed populations. It stabilises human security emergencies and the occurrence of natural and addresses underlying risks that contributed disasters. to the crisis2. The early recovery cluster pro The guiding principles of the Convention as vides great opportunity for including persons well as other articles on accessibility have also with disabilities and ensuring that reconstruc contributed to the inclusion of persons with dis tion considers accessibility for persons with dis abilities in international development and co abilities. It contributes to a development per operation. In the past ten years, organisations spective into emergency response which brings of persons with disabilities and disability or a better understanding of the need to consider ganisations used the UNCRPD to raise aware excluded and marginalised groups within early ness on disabilities making disability visible to recovery plans. As an example, since the Paki all. stan earthquake in 2005 within the cluster co ordination system a specific working group has From the Medical Model to the Social been set up to coordinate action related to per Model – Understanding Disability Issues sons with disabilities. Depending on the type of The UNCRPD definition as well as the develop disaster/crisis, the disability working group ori ment of the International Classification of Func ents its work either towards specific services or tioning Disability and Health by WHO (2001) inclusion of persons with disabilities in main has triggered a change in understanding dis stream relief actions. However it is to be noted ability; from a medical perspective to a human that the disability working group is not part of rights and social model. Disability is defined as the official cluster system but needs to be set up the result of interaction between environmental separately for every emergency and therefore it (societal) factors and personal factors (condi is not yet a sustainable strategy for inclusion. tions), whereby society and organisations can actively change environments and therefore fa SPHERE Standards3 cilitate functioning and increase capacities of In the revision of the SPHERE standards in 2011 persons with disabilities for better participation. a focal point on disability participated to the re vision process alongside others such as gender, Humanitarian Reform protection, etc. leading to inclusion of persons Since 2004, with the Asia- Pacific Tsunami, the with disabilities in the handbook. The SPHERE humanitarian sector realised that it needed to standards, being a well-known and widely used be reformed and a cluster coordination system handbook, has contributed to raise awareness 6 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE of humanitarian workers on disability and trig 2015 framework on DRR was a success. It is the gered some inclusive initiatives and requests for very first time that disability is provided with an support to disability organisations. equal voice to other groups in the process of defining an international framework. As a re Organisation of Persons with Disabilities sult, the Sendai framework for DRR adopted in Leadership March 2015 is highly disability inclusive and the Through the support of organisations such as world conference on DRR in Japan was made CBM or Handicap International, organisations accessible to persons with disability (physical of persons with disabilities have taken a and access to information). This should be con stronger role in raising awareness, implement sidered as a milestone towards inclusion and ing and contributing to emergency responses pave the way for further consideration of per and disaster risk reduction programs. The par sons with disabilities in the up-coming interna ticipation of persons with disabilities, their rep tional events, such as the Sustainable Develop resentative organisations and government bod ment Goals, Climate Change Conference and ies responsible for disability issues in emer especially towards the World Humanitarian gency responses increased the understanding Summit in May 2016 in Turkey. of mainstream stakeholders on the existing re sources and capacities to support inclusion of Future Opportunities and persons with disabilities. It allows a paradigm shift in the perception of persons with disabili Challenges ties as passive victims to being recognised as Despite all these shifts and successes there are contributing partners with possibilities to in still a number of challenges to ensure full inclu crease efficiency and effectiveness of humani sion and consideration of persons with disabili tarian action and disaster risk reduction strate ties in humanitarian action and disaster risk re gies. During the response to the cyclone in Phil duction strategies. ippines, an Ageing and Disability Task Force (ADTF) was set up through the protection clus Improving Data on Disability ter. The ADTF role was to provide information Despite recent improvement on gathering reli and data about affected persons with disabili able data related to disability, lack of compre ties, expertise on how to include persons with hensive data is a clear barrier to the design, disabilities in mainstream relief and capacity implementation and monitoring of disability in building workshops as well as to ensure link clusive humanitarian action and risk reduction ages between mainstream relief organisations plans. It is crucial that simple data collection and organisations of persons with disabilities. tools are developed and implemented to facili The ADTF members include international dis tate decision making and understanding of dis ability and ageing organisations, Filipino Disa ability perspectives. Often plans are developed bled Peoples’ Organisations (DPO) and the Na based on assumption or consultation only of or tional Council on Disability Affairs. This multi ganisations of persons with disabilities in major stakeholders approach ensured a quality re urban cities that often do not know or represent sponse to the basic and specific needs of per persons with disabilities living in rural remote sons with disabilities as well as provided guid areas and facing different challenges. Not hav ance and key elements to link up relief with de ing this baseline data is making monitoring of velopment, including strategies to reduce im improved inclusion difficult and reporting a real pact of disaster and increase resilience of com challenge for mainstream stakeholders. munities towards future disasters. Diversity of Disabilities Post-2015 Disaster Risk Reduction Though mainstream stakeholders have made progress in addressing the needs of persons Framework – Sendai Framework for with disabilities, it still addresses only the most Disaster Risk Reduction visible categories of disabilities, such as physi One of major shift seen during the various cal and sensory disability. The impression that post-2015 negotiation processes is the recogni response and disaster risk reduction programs tion of persons with disabilities and representa are then inclusive and that the task is accom tive organisations as key stakeholders. For the plished will remain a misconception until per build-up to the World Disaster Risk Reduction sons with more complex disabilities are in (DRR) conference in Sendai, the creation of a cluded. It is challenging not to leave behind disability stakeholder group4 to contribute to persons who are deafblind, persons with psy the development and negotiations of the post chosocial disabilities and persons with multiple Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 7 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE disabilities. Disability inclusion will not be suc emergency entitled “All under one Roof”5. A cessful before all persons with disabilities are consortium on Age and Disability including considered. among others Help Age International, Handi cap International and CBM is currently imple Lack of Evidence Based Information and menting a project supported by UK and US Research governments to develop training for main Very few scientific based evidence or research stream stakeholders to include older people exists about disability in humanitarian action and persons with disabilities in emergency re and risk reduction, so that strategies are devel sponse. It includes the development of stan oped based only on anecdotal facts and/or pro dards and online training that will be made ject outcomes. The risk is to miss the real needs available to all. The disability inclusive DRR and challenges faced by persons with disabili Network brings together mainstream organisa ties through their diversity. tions, disability organisations and DPOs with the objective to develop models and tools for Expertise disability inclusion in DRR6. There are and will be increased requests of support from mainstream organisations to Conclusions identify measures to ensure quality inclusion, however the capacity of DPOs need to be The above mentioned progresses demonstrate strengthened and built to maintain their credi a clear shift in understanding disability issues in bility as key leaders and contributors. There is emergency responses and disaster risk reduc still a gap in cross-understanding about con tion strategies. The awareness raising and lead straints and operation procedures between ership of DPOs have been successful, however mainstream humanitarian stakeholders and we need to continue to advocate for the rights persons with disabilities – learning each other’s of persons with disabilities and to build up fur jargon and specificity. ther expertise and tools to facilitate the realisa tion of disability-inclusive programs. Sufficient Financing resources need to be allocated to this process Despite an evolving understanding among hu and governments need to be held accountable manitarian donors, there are still questions to their commitments or legal instruments re about the cost of reasonable accommodation to lated to disability. It has been amazing for me ensure full inclusion of persons with disabilities. to witness and contribute to those changes in The financing of disability inclusion is perceived the past 20 years, more needs to be done but as decreasing the available resources to main we have moved a long way forward to leave no stream response instead of being looked at as one behind and build up an inclusive society. the responsibility of governments to ensure that everyone has equal opportunity to access life saving programs. Disability is not yet included Notes in funding guidelines requirements therefore 1. Humanitarian reform: http://www.humanitarianinfo. grants are approved which are not inclusive of org/iasc/pageloader.aspx?page=content-template disability. Some governments have made pro default&bd=87. gresses in developing reconstruction accessibil 2. Visit: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/clus ity guidelines or issuing political commitment to ters/early-recovery. inclusion, however, much remains to be done. 3. Visit: http://www.sphereproject.org/handbook/. 4. Visit: http://www.wcdrr.org/majorgroups/other. Opportunities 5. Visit: http://www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster Mainstream organisations have taken initiatives management/responding/services-for-the-disaster-af to develop their capacities and tools to include fected/shelter-and-settlement/shelter-library/. persons with disabilities in their responses and 6. Visit: www.didrrn.net. risk reduction strategies and programs. The World Health Organisation together with CBM References and others has recently published a guidance UNISDR (2015): Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Re note for inclusion of disability in emergency risk duction 2015-2030. Available at http://www.wcdrr. management for health stakeholders (2013). org/preparatory/post2015. Visited on 10 April 2015. The international Federation of the Red Cross UNITED NATIONS (2006): Convention on the Rights of together with CBM and Handicap International Persons with Disabilities. Available at http://www. has published an important guideline for dis un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. ability-inclusive shelter and settlements in Visited on 10 April 2015. 8 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE UNITED NATIONS (2007): Hyogo Framework for Action 15% de la population affectée quand elles répondent aux 2005-2015. Building the Resilience of Nations and catastrophes ou planifient leurs projets. L'article expliquera Communities to Disasters. Available at http://www. quelques-unes des raisons pour ce changement ainsi que unisdr.org/we/coordinate/hfa. Visited on 10 April les obstacles encore existants qui empêchent une pleine in 2015. tégration des questions du handicap dans la réduction des WHO (2001): International Classification of Functioning, risques d’urgences et de catastrophes. Disability and Health (ICF). Available at http://www. who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Visited on 10 April Resumen: En los últimos diez años, la toma de conciencia 2015. sobre la discapacidad ha aumentado entre las organizacio WHO (2013): Guidance Note on Disability and Emer nes de desarrollo, sin embargo, tomó más tiempo abrir los gency Risk Management for Health. Available at ojos del sector humanitario para el desarrollo de estrate http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/preparedness/ gias relacionadas con la Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres disability/en/. Visited on 10 April 2015. (RRD). No obstante, en los últimos cinco años ha sucedido WHO/WORLD BANK (2011): World Report on Disability. un inmenso cambio de comprensión y ejecución de los Available at http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_ proyectos, ya que muchas organizaciones se dieron cuenta report/2011/en/. Visisted on 10 April 2015. de que estaban perdiendo el 15% de la población afectada en sus intervenciones de emergencia. Zusammenfassung: In den letzten zehn Jahren hat das El artículo explica algunas de las razones para el cambio y Bewusstsein über Menschen mit Behinderung in Entwick las barreras que aún existen para una plena inclusión de lungsorganisationen zugenommen, allerdings dauerte es las personas discapacitadas en la reducción del riesgo de länger, die Augen der im humanitären Bereich tätigen Or emergencias y desastres. ganisationen einschließlich deren Entwicklung von Strategi en zur Katastrophenvorsorge für dieses Thema zu öffnen. Author: Valerie Scherrer is CBM International Director Trotzdem fand innerhalb der letzten fünf Jahre ein enormer of the Emergency Response Unit. She has been work Wandel im Verständnis und in der Projektdurchführung ing in the field of disability and humanitarian action statt, in denen viele Organisationen erkannten, dass sie since 1997. She has been part of first response team 15% der betroffenen Bevölkerung in ihren Krisenmaßnah following all major disasters and crisis in the past 15 men und deren Planung außen vor gelassen haben. Der Ar years developing disability inclusive emergency re tikel erläutert einige der Gründe für den Wandel und die sponses and working alongside mainstream stake immer noch existierenden Barrieren für die volle Inklusion holders to build their capacities to include disabilities. von behinderungsspezifischen Themen in Krisensituationen Valerie also started developing the Disability inclusive und Katastrophenvorsorge. Disaster Risk Reduction project in 2005 in Bangladesh as a way to improve and trigger inclusive emergency Résumé: Au cours des 10 dernières années, la sensibilisa responses. She has been very active together with Per tion sur le handicap a augmenté auprès des organisations sons with Disabilities Organisations in advocating for de développement, mais il a fallu plus de temps pour ouvrir inclusion of disabilities in both humanitarian actions les yeux du secteur humanitaire, y compris en ce qui con and Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy from local to na cerne le développement des stratégies liées à la réduction tional and international level. Valerie has also contrib des risques de catastrophes (RRC). Cependant, on a assisté uted to a number of tool development and publication à un immense changement de compréhension et de mise in relation to disability and emergency/disaster risk en œuvre de projets dans les 5 dernières années: de nom reduction. breuses organisations se rendent compte qu'elles omettent Contact: Valerie.Scherrer@cbm.org. Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 9 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE UNHCR’s Experience in Strengthening Protection of Persons with Disabilities in Forced Displacement Kirstin Lange This article outlines the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)’s approach to inclusion of persons with disabilities in protection and assistance programming. Underpinning UNHCR’s approach to working with persons with disabilities is adherence to the principle of non-discrimination, recognition of in dividual diversity and a strong emphasis on participation. Introduction ness and protect stateless persons. In support of The World Health Organisation (2014:29) esti its core activities on behalf of refugees, mates that 15% of the world’s population has UNHCR’s Executive Committee and the UN some form of disability. With 51.2 million per General Assembly have authorised involvement sons currently displaced worldwide (UNHCR with other groups. These include former refu 2014)1, it can be estimated that there are ap gees who have returned home and internally proximately 7.6 million persons with disabilities displaced people (IDP). These people are re among them. Persons with disabilities may have ferred to collectively as persons of concern to physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impair UNHCR. Within these populations, persons with ments, they may be women, girls, men or boys, disabilities face particular risks and have spe and come from diverse backgrounds2. In situa cific needs. Protection and assistance pro tions of displacement all of these aspects of grammes must thus be designed, implemented, age, gender and diversity intersect to influence monitored and evaluated in a disability inclu protection risks and shape an individual’s expe sive manner. rience. In 2010 as a demonstration of leadership The importance of considering the particular and commitment to integrate disability in all needs and rights of persons with disabilities in protection and assistance responses, UNHCR’s humanitarian response, including in situations governing Executive Committee adopted a Con of forced displacement, is well recognised in in clusion on Refugees with Disabilities and other ternational law and standards. For example, Persons with Disabilities Protected and Assisted Article 11 of the UN Convention on the Rights by UNHCR (UNHCR 2010). This document rec of Persons with Disabilities (2006:10) sets out ognises that specific needs of persons with dis the obligation of States Parties to “…ensure the abilities are often overlooked, especially during protection and safety of persons with disabilities early phases of humanitarian emergencies. It in situations of risk, including situations of calls upon States, UNHCR and partners to in armed conflict, humanitarian emergencies and clude refugees and other persons with disabili the occurrence of natural disasters”. Further, ties in relevant policies and programmes and to the Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter provide access to services. The conclusion also and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Re reiterates the importance of participation by sponse recognises that persons with disabilities persons with disabilities in the design and im “…face disproportionate risks in disaster situa plementation of services and programmes. tions and are often excluded from relief and re Inclusion of persons with disabilities is also habilitation processes” (The Sphere Project enshrined in UNHCR’s Age, Gender and Diver 2011:17). Despite this recognition, the inclu sity (AGD) Policy, which requires its operations sion of persons with disabilities in humanitarian worldwide to ensure that all persons of concern response in practice continues to be a chal enjoy their rights on an equal footing and are lenge, with meaningful participation in plan able to participate fully in decisions that affect ning and decision-making being particularly their lives (UNHCR 2011). The AGD Policy em limited. phasises that individual differences play a cen tral role in determining opportunities, capaci UNHCR’s Policy Framework for Disability ties, needs and vulnerability. Following on from Inclusion the AGD Policy, UNHCR in 2011 developed op UNHCR’s primary purpose is to safeguard the erational guidance on protection and assis rights and well-being of refugees. UNHCR also tance for persons of concern living with disabili has a mandate to prevent and reduce stateless ties. This Need to Know Guidance on Working 10 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE with Persons with Disabilities in Forced Displace In Lebanon, UNHCR recruits over 400 refugee ment3 outlines the essential elements of disabil outreach volunteers to share their skills and capa ity inclusive humanitarian response (UNHCR cities with both the Syrian and Lebanese commu 2011a). nities. Volunteers play an important role as advo cates for persons with disabilities, identifying those Implementation of Policy in the Field who are most at risk, providing them with infor While humanitarian actors are increasingly mation and working to decrease social isolation. aware of the need to include persons with dis One of these volunteers is Ahmad, who has a abilities in their response, the practical imple physical disability and uses a walking frame to mentation of policies on disability inclusion re move around. mains challenging. To achieve the meaningful In their role as volunteers, Ahmad and his wife, participation of persons of concern in decision Nazmiya carry out home visits together in order to making regarding their protection and wellbe be able to reach both men and women. During ing, UNHCR adopts a community-based and their visits, they meet refugees with disabilities who rights-based approach, which draws on the are isolated in their homes, while others experi knowledge, skills and experience of the indi ence emotional abuse from family and community viduals and communities involved. A key com members. According to Ahmad “This affects their ponent of this approach, the participatory as confidence to do things. They will feel like they sessment, involves building partnerships with don’t have one disability, but rather many disabili persons of concern from diverse backgrounds ties. […] I can provide support, communicate and through structured dialogue. This process is encourage them.” He adds, “The community usually implemented annually and provides an should not isolate persons with disabilities – they opportunity for persons of concern to partici all have a role” (WRC 2014a:1). pate in the identification of protection concerns This is just one example of the ways in which and generation of solutions. Participatory as persons with disabilities in situations of displace sessments aim to gather information on specific ment can contribute to their communities. We protection risks and their underlying causes, as must empower people to use the skills and well as the capacities and proposed solutions of strengths they have; and remember that everyone affected persons and communities. Consulta has a role to play in their family and community. tion with persons with disabilities is required during participatory assessment exercises, in This story was contributed by Carol El Sayed, Commu cluding through separate discussions where nity-based Protection Officer, UNHCR Lebanon, el needed. sayed@unhcr.org Building on the established participatory as sessment process, country operations carry out organisations. During this period, WRC con ongoing dialogue with persons of concern. For sulted with refugees and IDPs with disabilities example, in Thailand, UNHCR conducts and their care-givers in eight countries to iden monthly meetings with persons with disabilities tify protection concerns and to gather their per who have formed self-help groups, providing a spectives on ways to make programmes more forum for persons with disabilities to access accessible and inclusive. Promising practices UNHCR, pose questions and to raise issues or and ongoing challenges to disability inclusion share information. Other country operations in UNHCR operations were subsequently out have initiated more in-depth assessment of the lined in the report Disability Inclusion- Translat situation of persons with disabilities. For exam ing Policy into Practice in Humanitarian Action4 ple, according to the AGD Monitoring Report of launched by WRC in 20145. 2014, an assessment conducted in Eritrea iden tified important gaps in service delivery, includ Identified Concerns of Persons with ing that some mobility devices that had previ ously been distributed could not be used due to Disabilities and UNHCR Response camp topography and the need for additional UNHCR’s continuous efforts to strengthen im assistance (such as access to rehabilitation serv plementation of the AGD policy, as well as col ices). laboration between UNHCR and WRC have In order to further strengthen implementa produced a substantial body of knowledge and tion of policy and guidance in the field, UNHCR experience for UNHCR and other humanitarian partnered with the Women’s Refugee Commis actors to learn from and to build upon. Some sion (WRC) between 2011 and 2013 to provide examples of the information and practices technical support and training to UNHCR coun gathered follow. try offices, implementing partners and disability Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 11 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE Community Participation This approach impedes inclusion of persons While physical accessibility of buildings and fa with disabilities. cilities is often one of the first actions consid UNHCR country operations commonly report ered working with persons with disabilities, this obstacles to access to inclusive education for was, in fact, rarely raised by refugees them refugee children with disabilities. For example, selves, according to WRC’s research (2014). In even in countries where host governments al stead, issues of social inclusion and participa low refugee children to attend local schools, it tion appear to be far more important, as dem is often reported that in practice few children onstrated in the following example from Leba with disabilities can access these schools, re non. sulting in isolation, exposing them to protection risks and denying them the right to an educa Access to Services tion. In Jordan, UNHCR is addressing this issue Lack of access to basic services has been identi by strengthening the referral system with pro fied as a concern in a number of country op tection partners to ensure that children with erations, with access impacted by a number of disabilities are identified and can attend public underlying factors. For example, in Lebanon, school; as well as working with partners to pro refugees with disabilities have reported a lack vide special education. In two refugee camps in of information about services and access to Thailand, UNHCR’s implementing partner, Jes transport to reach services as key concerns. uit Refugee Service (JRS), has special education While in a number of countries refugees have teachers based in the school to identify educa access to government services for citizens — for tional needs of each child and develop indi example in Turkey refugees with disabilities ac vidualised education plans. In addition, JRS cess social services including disability care al raises awareness on disability issues at Parent- lowances — this is not the case in all countries Teacher Association meetings; and provides where UNHCR operates. In contexts where home-based educational opportunities for chil refugees with disabilities have limited access to dren unable to reach the school, to ensure indi services, some country operations prioritise per vidualised support and to explore strategies for sons with disabilities for assistance or appoint future participation in school. disability focal points to facilitate referral pro cesses. However, such strategies cannot ad Protection Concerns dress all concerns surrounding access to assis Violence against persons with disabilities is tance. For example, if appropriate distribution commonly reported in all contexts; and while mechanisms are not in place, persons with dis girls with mental and intellectual impairments abilities may be forced to rely on community are more at risk of sexual violence, men and members to transport food or non-food items boys are more likely to report physical and psy back to shelters, in return for a portion of their chological violence. In Lebanon, for example, supplies or money. There remains a need for Syrian male refugees with injuries and disabili creative solutions to address the challenges of ties reported that they are targeted at check access to services in camp and non-camp set points due to a perceived link with fighters in tings. Syria. In many settings, women and girls feel A number of country operations have re unsafe even in their own homes, due to the risk ported a lack of access to specialised services, a of neglect and physical abuse. In order to gap that is often addressed through partnership strengthen protection of persons with disabili with a specialist organisation, where these or ties, UNHCR works with partners and commu ganisations have a presence and where re nities to prevent, identify and respond to differ sources are available. For example, in Bangla ent types of violence. For example, UNHCR in desh, where refugees with disabilities had lim Lebanon developed and piloted a training ited access to specialised services, UNHCR package on case management to identify and started working with Handicap International to respond to the needs of persons with disabili assess the needs of refugees in the camps and ties at heightened risk. In Nepal, UNHCR, to to provide assistive devices. One of the chal gether with the refugee community, developed lenges for humanitarian actors is that special a system using visual aids to allow persons with ised services may be unavailable, particularly in hearing impairments to report and describe in resource-poor settings and at early stages of cidents of sexual and gender based violence humanitarian emergencies. However, UNHCR (SGBV). has learned that humanitarian actors often fo Access to registration and documentation cus on disability specific programs and activi has also been identified as a key protection ties, rather than on access to regular programs. concern for persons with disabilities in situa- 12 Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 Disability and International Development
ARTIKEL/ARTICLE tions of forced displacement. Undocumented The Way Forward individuals are known to be particularly vulner able to exploitation and abuse and face serious In order to advance inclusion of persons with difficulties in obtaining urgently needed assis disabilities within protection and assistance tance and durable solutions. In response, programming, UNHCR has embarked upon a UNHCR employs a number of actions to identify capacity building initiative, which includes the and ensure registration for persons with dis engagement of a Senior Disability Advisor, to abilities. For example, in Turkey, refugee com support the integration of disability and to mittees and representatives conduct tent visits manage a new project to strengthen the pro to identify persons with specific needs, includ tection of persons with disabilities in forced dis ing persons with disabilities. In Lebanon, mo placement situations. The two-year project aims bile registration and registration in absentia to build the capacity of UNHCR operations to has been established for those unable to reach implement UNHCR policy and guidance on dis registration centers to ensure that refugees with ability. Once again partnering with the disabilities have access to registration pro Women’s Refugee Commission, the project will cesses. provide technical support to eight UNHCR country operations and consultations with per Community Support Structures sons with disabilities will be a core component. Situations of displacement often exacerbate the Training on disability inclusion for UNHCR staff vulnerability and isolation of persons with dis and partners; as well as building of networks abilities due to a loss of family and community between UNHCR and host community DPOs, support structures. For example, in the Central will be particular areas of focus. Action plans African Republic, it was found that due to a for strengthening protection of persons with break down in the social fabric brought about disabilities will be developed jointly by country by displacement, community support for per operations and displaced persons with disabili sons with disabilities is minimal and they face ties, with support from DPOs. A key output of stigma and discrimination both from refugee the project will be a comprehensive training and host communities. For children and young package for UNHCR staff and other humanitar people, this exclusion reduces access to educa ian actors on strengthening protection of per tion and social networks that could enhance sons with disabilities in forced displacement. their protection from various forms of violence. In response, a number of country operations Conclusion have prioritised community awareness raising activities regarding the rights of persons with Situations of forced displacement generate vul disabilities and support to community-based nerabilities and protection risks for persons with approaches to empowerment. For example, in disabilities, above and beyond those faced by Nepal, women with disabilities formed groups other segments of displaced populations. Per to raise awareness and subsequently undertook sons with disabilities also come to situations of SGBV prevention activities together with the displacement with valuable skills and resources, wider community. which are often overlooked by humanitarian While disabled persons organisations (DPOs) actors. It is thus incumbent upon humanitarian can play an important role in advocating for the actors to both strengthen the inclusion of per rights of persons with disabilities, inclusion and sons with disabilities within protection and as access to services and programs, the lack of sistance programmes and to promote their em networking between national DPOs and refu powerment within their families and communi gees with disabilities is an obstacle. In many ties. As this article has highlighted, a key to do cases, host community DPOs are not aware of ing so is to ensure the participation of persons the situation of displaced persons with disabili with disabilities in the assessment of protection ties; and the building of greater linkages be risks, design and implementation of protection tween UNHCR, displaced persons and host and assistance programming, as well as in community DPOs has been identified as a nec monitoring and evaluation. Strategies to facili essary action. While UNHCR’s engagement tate this participation need to be specific to with DPOs is currently limited, a new project each particular context. A failure to do so leads (outlined below) in selected countries has now to programming that is not responsive to the been launched to address this challenge and to needs of persons with disabilities and misses strengthen a community-based and rights the opportunity to build on their capacity to based approach to working with persons with make positive contributions to their communi disabilities in situations of forced displacement. ties. Behinderung und internationale Entwicklung 1/2015 13 Disability and International Development
Sie können auch lesen