Large capacity solar adsorption cooling at the Festo company
←
→
Transkription von Seiteninhalten
Wenn Ihr Browser die Seite nicht korrekt rendert, bitte, lesen Sie den Inhalt der Seite unten
CEP CLEAN ENERGY POWER® 2009
Large capacity solar adsorption
cooling at the Festo company
Dirk Pietruschka, Antoine Dalibard, Ursula Eicker
Folie 1
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netContent
Part A: Solar cooling system
FESTO office building and cooling system
Solar collector field
Research
R h Projects,
P j t funding
f di and
d institutions
i tit ti
involved
P tB
Part B: Simulation
Si l ti based
b d performance
f analysis
l i
during the planning phase of the solar
collector
ll t field
fi ld
Analysed cases and control options
Simulation results and conclusions
Folie 2
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netContent
Part C: Measured performance of the collector
field 2008 compared to predicted values
Part D: Online
O li simulation
i l i tooll
Comparison online simulation tool / measured
performance data
Conclusions and Outlook
Folie 3
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netA) Office building, FESTO AG & Co. KG
Solar collector field
25.000 m² gross floor area
Heat
Heat- and Cold distribution through thermal
activated ceilings and ventilation system
Cold production with three 353 kW MYCOM
adsorption chillers and thermally activated
bored piles of the buildings foundation
Utilisation of compressor waste heat
Folie 4
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netA) Solar collector field; FESTO AG & Co. KG
Collector area: 1218 m² (aperture area)
1330
330 m² (brutto
(b u o area)
a ea)
Collector type: Paradigma CPC collectors with
evacuated tubes
- 58 Paradigma CPC 30 with
3,0 m² aperture area each
- 232 Paradigma
P di CPC 45 with
ith
4,5 m² aperture area each
Connection: all parallel
Orientation: South
Tilt angle:
l 30°
Guaranteed result: 500 MWh/a
Folie 5
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netA) Integration of the solar collector field
in the existing heat distribution
Activated ceilings
Stat. Cooling tower
TSA max. 200 kW
CPC evacuated – heating 1‐3
1 3
1218 m² tube collectors grid.
50/30°C 28/25°C
Heat storages
8.5 m³ 8.5 m³ V
M
70/50°C ADCM
1‐3
TWU
max.
TSE
600 kW 70/60°C
14/9°C
‐ Heat recovery compressors
(400 ‐500 kW)
‐ 3 gas boilers 5.5 MW
Heat distribution Cold distribution
Folie 6
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netA) Reaserch Projects, Funding and
Institutions Involved
Cooperation Project:
Simulation based control optimisation of buildings
with sustainable cooling systems
Design
Design, implementation and
commissioning of the monitoring
system of the plant
P
Performance
f analysis
l i and
d graphical
hi l
presentation of the monitoring data Simulation based control optimisation of
the partly solar driven adsorption
Simulation based p performance chillers of the FESTO AG & Co
Co. KG
observation and proof of guaranteed Online simulation based performance
solar energy yield observation of the absorption chillers
Evaluation of optimisation potentials and supporting solar collector field
Folie 7
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Simulation based performance analysis
of the collector field
Q
Questions analysed
y during g the planning
p g
phase of the collector field:
How do different collector start up
temperature limits influence the annual
performance of the collector field?
p
Mass flow control of the collector pump or
simple on-/off
on /off control?
Performance improvement through supply
temperature reduction in the primary
heating circuit of the activated ceilings?
Folie 8
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Dynamic simulation model in INSEL
Folie 9
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Analysed control options
Bezeichnung
Description Regelung
Control of der
the Kollektorsoll-
Start-up Vor-/Rücklauf
Supply / return
Kollektorpumpe
collector pump temperatur
temperature solarer Primärkreis
primary solar circuit
Winter Sommer Activated
Winter Summer Bauteil- Heizungs-
Heat
ceilings
aktivierung distributer
verteiler
Case 1 1
Variante ON / OFF 70 °C 50°C / 30°C 70°C / 60°C
Variante
Case 2 2 ON / OFF 50°CC
50 70°CC
70 50°CC / 30
50 30°CC 70
70°CC / 60
60°CC
Variante
Case 3 3 Volumenstrom
mass flow 50°C 70°C 50°C / 30°C 70°C / 60°C
Case 4 4
Variante Volumenstrom
mass flow 40°C 70°C 40°C / 30°C 70°C / 60°C
Folie 10
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Boundary conditions of the simulations
Weather data:
1. Annual simulations: Insel Weather data base location Stuttgart
2 Summer 2006:
2. Nearby weather station UNI
UNI-Hohenheim
Hohenheim
Heating load/degree of utilisation of solar heat:
1. Annual simulations: Assumption: Qh,building ≥ QCollector
2. Summer 2006: Real measured heating energy
consumption of the three AdCM
Shading losses: Geometric shading model
Folie 11
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Results of annual simulations :
- Influence of setpoints and pump control
760 14
Wh/a .
+12,0%
740 12
vement / % .
heating energy / MW
720 +9,4% 10
720
6,9%
+6 9%
nce improv
700 8
704
680 687 6
Performan
eful solar h
660 4
P
640 2
Use
643
620 0
Case 1 ((Tset = 70°C Case 2 ((Tset = 50°C Case 3 ((Tset = 50°C Case 4 ((Tset = 40°C
winter and summer, winter / 70°C summer, winter / 70°C summer, winter / 70°C summer,
On/Off-control of On/Off-control of collector pump with collector pump with
collector pump) collector pump) mass flow control) mass flow control)
Useful solar heating energy / MWh/a Performance improvement Folie 12
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Results of annual simulations :
- Influence of setpoints and pump control
Wh/m²a . 640 50
610 47.0
energy / kW
45.9
44 8
44.8
stem efficiiency / %
580 591 45
578
550 42.0 564
spec. useful solar heating e
520 528 40
Solar sys
490
460 35
430
400 30
Case 1 (Tset = 70°C
70 C Case 2 (Tset = 50°C
50 C Case 3 (Tset = 50°C
50 C Case 4 (Tset = 40°C
40 C
winter and summer, winter / 70°C summer, winter / 70°C summer, winter / 70°C summer,
On/Off-control of On/Off-control of collector pump with collector pump with
collector pump) collector pump) mass flow control) mass flow control)
Spec. useful solar heating energy Solar system efficiency Folie 13
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Results of annual simulations :
- Influence of different system losses, Case 2
820 10
800
ÆNot considered: 8.94 9
eating enerrgy / MWh//a .
780
- losses through frost protection 8
- losses through system start-up
em losses / %
760 7
755
740 6
5.03 723
720 5
Syste
ul solar he
717
700 4.17 4
680 687 3
Usefu
660 2
640 1
Case 2, incl. only Case 2, incl. heat Case 2, incl. storage Case 2, incl. storage
storage heat losses losses throug storage heat losses and and tubing heat losses
and tubing shading losses and shading losses
Useful solar heating energy / MWh/a System losses Folie 14
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Simulation results summer 2006:
- Meteorological conditions
250 25
Weather station UNI Hohenheim 2006
hly solar irrradiation / kWh/m² .
200 214 20
199
Temperature / °C
C
150 159 15
143
130
100 10
Month
50 5
0 0
Mai June July August September
Monthly solar irradiation External mean temperature Folie 15
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Simulation results summer 2006:
- Solar fraction ACM heating energy demand
0.5 1000
sumption / MWh
0.45 900
0.4 800
0.35 700
ar fraction / -
energy cons
0.3 600
0.25 26.3% 500
Sola
g-/heating e
02
0.2 400
20.7%
14.8%
0.15 300
14.9% 15.0%
01
0.1 200
Cooling
0.05 100
0 0
Mai June July August September
Solar fraction on the ACM heating energy consumption Case 2
Cooling energy consumption, FESTO 2006
Heating energy consumption ACM, FESTO 2006 Folie 16
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netB) Conclusions
Due to permanent use of the produced solar heating energy:
Æ high
g specific
p useful heating
g energy
gy > 530 kWh/m²a
/
Æ high solar system efficiency 42 – 47 %
7 % increase of solar heating energy possible for different
collector temperature setpoints for summer and winter
operation (70°C summer / 50°C Winter)
2,5 % increase in solar heating energy for collector pump
with mass flow control instead of On-/Off control
T
Temperature
t reduction
d ti iin the
th primary
i heating
h ti circuit
i it off the
th
activated ceilings revels in additional 2,6 % increase of solar
heatingg energy
gy
15 to 25 % solar fraction of the heating energy demand of
the adsorption chillers expected.
Folie 17
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Measured performance of the collector
field 2008 compared to predicted values
Objectives:
Demonstration of the quality of dynamic simulation based
performance predictions.
- Prediction with long term weather data (Part B
B, Case 2)
- Real measured performance data 2008
Discussion of possible reasons for deviations between
prediction and measured data
Data source:
Measured performance data of the solar collector field
from March to December 2008
(Monitoring system: Hochschule Offenburg,
Solarthermie 2000plus Æ 5 min mean values )
Folie 18
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Measured performance compared to
predicted values
Wrong
hydraulic
brake Problems with heat flow to the building
and stagnation
Discharge vol. flow
sensor problems
Æ Intensive measurement phase Solarthermie 2000plus Folie 19
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Possible reasons for large difference
between prediction and measured data
Wrong
hydraulic
brake
Æ Intensive measurement phase
Folie 20
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Possible reasons for large difference
between prediction and measured data
Heat Production and Utilisation of the FESTO Solar Collector Field in 2008
100 100
Problems with heat flow to the building
y / MWh .
and stagnation
80 80
Heat utilisation / %
Wrong hydraulic Discharge vol.
vol flow
mal energy
60 60
brake sensor problems
40 40
Solar therm
20 20
S
0 0
ay
ch
r
r
ly
ril
ne
er
st
r
be
be
be
Ju
Ap
gu
ob
M
ar
Ju
em
em
em
Au
M
ct
O
ov
ec
pt
Se
N
D
Solar energy deliverd by the collector circuit including losses Measured useful solar heat delivered to the building / ACM
Utilisation of delivered solar heat Folie 21
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Possible reasons for large difference
between prediction and measured data
Heat Distribution of the Solar Heat Delivered by the
FESTO Solar Collector Field in 2008
100
Æ Much lower heat input to the low
temperature heating circuit of the
80
activated ceilings than assumed!
Wh .
energy / MW
Æ Optimisation potential?
60
40
Solarr thermal e
20
0
ch
ai
t
r
r
ril
ly
ne
r
er
s
be
be
be
Ju
Ap
M
gu
ob
ar
Ju
em
em
em
Au
M
ct
O
-20
ec
ov
pt
Se
N
D
Measured useful solar heat delivered to the building / ACM Heat delivered to distributer 16 (ACM and building)
Heat delivered to activated ceilings of the building Æ Intensive measurement phase
Folie 22
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC) Conclusions
Reasons for deviations between prediction and measurement:
ÆLosses through system startup and frost protection not considered in
th simulation
the i l ti tool
t l Æ 10 % heat
h t losses!
l !
ÆAdditional heat losses in March and April due to a wrongly
dimensioned hydraulic brake Æ backflow of warm water into
the collector field during night time
Æ 3 % lower measured solar irradiation
ÆProblems with the heat flow to the building in August 2008 and
resulting stagnation of the collector field Æ lower efficiency
ÆM h lower
ÆMuch l heat
h t input
i t to
t the
th low
l temperature
t t heating
h ti circuit
i it off the
th
activated ceilings than assumed by the ideal control of the simulation
model!
Æ Higher collector temperatures and lower system efficiency
Æ Possible optimisation potential for the implemented control
ÆTogether around 30% losses not considered in the simulations Folie 23
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netC.1) Measured performance of the
adsorption chillers 2008
Ads orption c hillers
600 0.60
500 0.50
Q h,boilers
Q h,c hillers
erg y (MWh )
400 0 40
0.40
Q was te_heat
C OP
300 0.30 Q h,s olar
A ds orption c hillers heat s ourc e period
E ne
C OP AK M
A pril‐November 2008
200 0.20
8%
100 0 10
0.10
26% Q s olar
0 0.00
A pril May J une J uly A ug us t S eptemberO c toberNovember
66%
Q was te heat
Q boilers
Folie 24
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD) Online simulation tool and
measured pperformance data
Objectives:
Validation of the simulation
sim lation models (collector
(collecto field and ACM)
Implementation of an online simulation based performance
observation
Simulation based control optimisation of the ACM cascade
Data source:
Measured performance data of the solar collector field
from April to December 2008
(Monito ing system:
(Monitoring s stem Ho
Hochschule
hs h le Offenb
Offenburg,
g Sola
Solarthermie
the mie 2000plus
2000pl s
Æ 5 min mean values )
Measured detailed pperformance data of the adsorption
p chillers
(FESTO building management system, 10 s mean values)
Folie 25
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.1) Validation dynamic solar system model
Example, one day in July
T _amb T c ol_out T c ol_out_s im T P S 2U_s im T P S 1O
T P S 1O _s im T P S 2U V dot_c ol V dot_tank Gt
110 1200
Tstorage1,top
storage1 top ≥ 80
80°C
C Heat delivered to ACM T < 72
72°C
C
19.02.2008
19 02 2008
05.07.2008 storage1 top
storage1,top
100
w rate / m³/h
T c ol,out 1000
90
80
S olar irradia tion / W/m² ‐ Volume flow
s torage 1,top 800
T emperaature / °C
70
60
s torage 2,bottom 600
50
Gt
40
400
T amb
30
20 200
V dot
d tc ol
10
V dotload
0 0
0:05
0:45
1:25
2:05
2:45
3:25
4:05
4:45
5:25
6:05
6:45
7:25
8:05
8:45
9:25
0:05
0:45
1:25
2:05
2:45
3:25
4:05
4:45
5:25
6:05
6:45
7:25
8:05
8:45
9:25
0:05
0:45
1:25
2:05
2:45
3:25
00
00
01
02
02
03
04
04
05
06
06
07
08
08
09
10
10
11
12
12
13
14
14
15
16
16
17
18
18
19
20
20
21
22
22
23
Folie 26
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.1) Validation dynamic solar system model
Results and conclusions
Comparison of measured and simulated results
Qsol Qcol_m Qcol_sim Qload_m Qload_sim Dev. Dev.
col load
kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh/m² % %
5th July 8.04 4.32 4.17 3.92 4.04 -3.2 +3.1
Conclusions
- Good representation of the solar system performance by the
developed dynamic system model
- Improvements:
- shorter time steps 10 s instead of 5 min mean values
Æ Data transfer via OPC and Labview from the BMS
- Improvement of the stratified solar storage model
Æ fixed heat input at predefined storage layers
Folie 27
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.2) Development and validation
adsorption
p chiller model
Problem:
Discontinuous dynamics of adsorption/desorption cycle
causes variable cooling effects
Æ Dynamic
y model required
q which accounts for the
transient behaviour [Saha 1995 + simplified silicagel model
according to Henry’s law proposed by Ng and Chua 2001]
Objectives:
Analysis
y of optimisation
p potentials
p through
g the implementation
p
of variable cycle times in the ACM control
Implementation of an online simulation tool for plant
observation and control optimisation with e.g. variable
generator mass flow rates at part load or optimised control
of the chiller cascade Folie 28
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.2) Comparison to measured data at
standard operation conditions
80
70
G enerator
60
perature / °C
50
40
Abs orber / C ondens er
30
T emp
20
10
E vaporator
0
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440
T ime / S ek
T g,in T g,out, meas T g,out s im T a,in / T c,in
T a,out meas T a,out s im T c,out meas T c,out s im
T e,in
i T e,out meas T e,out s iim Folie 29
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.2) Comparison to real measured data
with different generator volume flow rates
Theat_out Tcool_out Tchill_out Theat_out_sim Tcool_out_sim Tchill_out_sim Theat_in Tcool_in Tchill_in
80
19.03.2008 Vdot_heat = 90 m³ / h Vdot_cool = 200 m³/h Vdot_chill = 58 m³ / h
70
60 Generator
C
Case 1
50
ure / °C
Temperatu
40
Adsorber / Condenser
30
20
Evaporator
10
0
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
56
46
36
26
16
06
:03:3
:04:2
:05:1
:06:0
:06:5
:07:4
:08:3
:09:2
:10:1
:11:0
:11:5
:12:4
:13:3
:14:2
:15:1
:16:0
:16:5
:17:4
:18:3
:19:2
:20:1
:21:0
:21:5
:22:4
:23:3
:24:2
:25:1
:26:0
:26:5
:27:4
:28:3
:29:2
:30:1
:31:0
:31:5
:32:4
:33:3
:34:2
:35:1
:36:0
Folie 30
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.2) Comparison of results and conclusions
Comparison of measured and simulated data
Theat_in Vdot_heat P_cool,m P_cool,sim COP_m COP_sim Dev. Dev.
Pcool COP
°C m³/h kW kW - - % %
Case 1 70-72 90 338.7 346.3 0.49 0.52 + 2.3 + 6.3
Case 2 78-80 65 360.6 358.0 0.458 0.476 - 0.7 + 3.9
Case 3 68-70 50 304.3 295.6 0.49 0.54 - 2.8 + 11.7
Conclusions
- Very good agreement between simulation model and
measurementt also
l for
f variable
i bl operation
ti conditions
diti
- Implementation as online simulation tool in February 2009
Folie 31
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netD.3) Implementation of online simulation
tools in the local BMS
Local Data Logging
Supervisory
Control Module
OPC-Clients DS
DS-
BMS Server O li Si
Online Simulation
l ti T Tooll
vpn
Remote
Desktop
Citadel PC Anywhere
SQL Database
Daily archiv FTP
02.07.2007.zip OG / Stgt
Local E t
External
l Folie 32
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netOutlook
Automated data-transfer between BMS and online simulation
tool with high time resolution
(OPC-interface, LabView, DataSocket) Æ finished
Implementation of a permanent and automated
performance observation of solar plant and adsorption
chillers Æ February / March 2009
Primary energy optimised simulation based control
of the adsorption chillers including all subsystems
Æ May / June 2009
Folie 33
5. CEP 2009, Stuttgart Januar 2008 Zentrum für angewandte Forschung an Fachhochschulen
M.Sc. Dirk Pietruschka Nachhaltige Energietechnik
www.zafh.netSie können auch lesen
