CIO ROUNDTABLE Maurice Pedergnana Zugerberg Finanz July 2, 2020
←
→
Transkription von Seiteninhalten
Wenn Ihr Browser die Seite nicht korrekt rendert, bitte, lesen Sie den Inhalt der Seite unten
3 topics Part I - March 23 until now • How did the crisis impact the companies in the portfolio? • How have reacted to the new situation (be honest !)? • Did your analysis, sentiment match with the psychology & behaviour of investors? Part II - Actions at the bottom of the global recession (in April/May) and at the beginning (May/June) of this new business cycle • Did you change and how (fast) did you change the weight of asset classes? • What actions have you taken? What is the overall market share of risky assets? • What is the role of technology (US, Europa, EM) in your portfolio? Part III - Expectations: 3 most important post pandemic portfolio advises • What are your key learnings ? What are your portfolios return expectations? • What are your 3 most important positions on your conviction list?
March 23 until now… • We initially underestimated the threat of the pandemic – remember the new highs in February just before the crash? It seemed like the market was unbreakable… • We expected the Fed and congress to move aggressively using the GFC playbook but were surprised that the market at first continued to sell-off on the announced measures. • In Mid-March we decided to stay invested as huge volatility levels meant a bottom could happen suddenly and forcefully and we would likely miss-time it. • Then we also decided to stepwise rebalance and add to our highest conviction single equity names. • We did not expect the rebound to break above 2.900 in the SPX. This is were the reopening FOMO really took over. 1
Bottom • Our portfolios are strongly focused on large cap, quality, momentum which saved us from the worst fallout. Leverage was the toxic factor to own going into the crisis. • We sold positions in Japan equity (were afraid of cancelation of Olympics) and exited EM HY debt completely (global dash for USD potentially a big problem for EM). • We decided early on (Mid-March) that mega cap US tech (MSFT, AMZN, GOOG, MA, ADBE, …) would likely come out strong of the initial crash given huge cash positions and perfectly suited (digitalized) business models. • On March 26th we decided to increase our Gold allocation even further – from 10% to 15%. The liquidity induced sell-off in gold was seen as an opportunity. • At around 0.7% in the 10yr US-T we completely sold our long duration, high grade sovereign bond exposure. The hedging capabilities now seem greatly reduced. 2
New Business Cycle? • In early April we bought CoCos (perceived attractive risk/adjusted return expectations). This time around banks are part of the solution (getting money to the real economy) and not the problem. • End of April we also bought CLOs, which we rationalized with the Fed backstopping this market. • In May we resisted the urge to jump into the beaten down leisure stocks and keep our quality focus. A sustainable value rotation seemed unjustified - and still does… • We are not sure this really is a new business cycle (old leaders are the new leaders). • We never got to distressed valuations and “real despair” as is typical for a cyclical bottom. 3
Outlook I • 2021 could be a very good year for risk assets, given that historically increase in money supply impacts risk assets with a lag and infrastructure stimulus should come through some time next year. • We expect a 10-15% return in equities 18 months forward with a ~15-20% drawdown on the way. • Europe has potential to catch up on better crisis management and steps towards fiscal union. • Key learning: Hedge your portfolio when you can, not when you feel you must. Keep a tail-risk hedge in your portfolio at all time. Market depth disappears very quickly and computerized trading can lead to relentless selling. Once the VIX gets above 25, huge moves can happen very fast. 4
Outlook II Conviction list: “Tech / Gold barbell portfolio” The wave of liquidity together with low rates will likely continue to boost tech stocks (as long duration, quality play) in 2021, hurt the U.S. dollar and lift gold as a store of value (negative real yields – don’t underestimate inflation risks!) • Gold – we expect new highs in 2021. • Big Tech US and China (MSFT, ADBE, AMZN, BABA, TENCENT, JD, ASML, INTC) • Long EUR vs USD and CHF (but if we see a double-dip CHF will likely be preferred safe haven) 5
Happy Future 6
The Fed is buying REITs, HY ETFs, selected Fallen Angel Bonds … 7
Disclaimer Diese Präsentation dient nur zu allgemeinen Informationszwecken und für die persönliche Verwendung durch den Empfänger dieses Dokuments (nachfolgend «Empfänger» genannt). Sie stellt weder ein Angebot noch eine Aufforderung seitens oder im Auftrag der Finad AG zum Erwerb, zur Zeichnung, zum Verkauf oder zur Rückgabe von Anlagen oder zur Investition in eine bestimmte Handelsstrategie oder zur Tätigung eines sonstigen Geschäfts in irgendeiner Rechtsordnung dar. Sie stellt keine Empfehlung der Finad AG in rechtlicher, buchhalterischer oder steuerlicher Hinsicht oder eine Zusicherung bezüglich Eignung oder Angemessenheit einer bestimmten Anlagestrategie, Transaktion oder Investition für den einzelnen Empfänger dar. Ein Bezug auf die Performance der Vergangenheit ist nicht als Hinweis auf die Zukunft zu verstehen. Die in der vorliegenden Publikation enthaltenen Informationen und Analysen wurden aus Quellen zusammengetragen, die als zuverlässig und glaubwürdig gelten. Die Finad AG gibt jedoch keine Gewähr hinsichtlich deren Zuverlässigkeit und Vollständigkeit und lehnt jede Haftung für Verluste ab, die sich aus der Verwendung dieser Informationen ergeben. Alle Meinungen und Ansichten stellen Einschätzungen dar, die zum Zeitpunkt der Drucklegung galten; Änderungen bleiben jederzeit vorbehalten, wobei keine Verpflichtung zur Aktualisierung und Mitteilung besteht. Bevor Empfänger eine Anlage-, Transaktions- oder sonstige finanzielle Entscheidung treffen, sollten sie die Eignung einer solchen Investition, Transaktion oder sonstigen Geschäfts für ihre speziellen Verhältnisse abklären und unabhängig (allenfalls mit ihren professionellen Beratern) die besonderen Risiken sowie die rechtlichen, regulatorischen, kreditmässigen, steuerlichen und buchhalterischen Konsequenzen prüfen. Bezüglich der in dieser Publikation erwähnten Anlagefonds und/oder anderen Finanzinstrumente ist darauf hinzuweisen, dass diese Publikation keinen Verkaufsprospekt im Sinne von Art. 75 ff. des Bundesgesetzes über kollektive Kapitalanlagen (KAG) darstellt. Die in diesem Dokument erwähnten Fonds und/oder anderen Finanzinstrumente sind (abgesehen von Luxembourg) nicht für den öffentlichen Vertrieb ausserhalb der Schweiz zugelassen. Der jeweilige Empfänger ist dafür verantwortlich, zu überprüfen, ob er nach dem in seinem Wohnsitzstaat und/oder auf seine Nationalität anwendbaren Recht berechtigt ist, diese Publikation zum persönlichen Gebrauch anzufordern, zugestellt zu erhalten und zu benutzen. Finad AG lehnt diesbezüglich jegliche Haftung ab. Eine Anlage in die in diesem Dokument erwähnten Fonds und/oder andere Finanzinstrumente sollte erst nach vorheriger sorgfältiger Lektüre und Prüfung des aktuellsten Verkaufsprospekts, des Fondsreglements sowie der darin enthaltenen rechtlichen Informationen und nach vorgängiger Konsultation Ihres Kundeberaters sowie – soweit erforderlich – Ihres eigenen Rechts- und/oder Steuerberaters erfolgen. Der jeweilige Empfänger ist dafür verantwortlich, zu überprüfen, ob er nach dem in seinem Wohnsitzstaat und/oder auf seine Nationalität anwendbaren Recht berechtigt ist, die entsprechenden Fondsdokumente anzufordern und zu erhalten. Weder das vorliegende Dokument noch Kopien davon dürfen in die Vereinigten Staaten versandt oder dahin mitgenommen oder in den Vereinigten Staaten verteilt oder US-Personen ausgehändigt werden. Die vorliegende Präsentation darf ohne die vorherige schriftliche Zustimmung der Finad AG weder auszugsweise noch vollständig vervielfältigt werden. Finad FINAD GmbH / FINAD Family Office GmbH, Dorotheergasse 6-8/L/021, 1010 Wien, Österreich ÖSTERREICH: FINAD GmbH, Wien, ist eine Wertpapierfirma gemäß §3 Wertpapieraufsichtsgesetz 2018 und als solche berechtigt, die Wertpapierdienstleistungen der Anlageberatung, der Portfolioverwaltung sowie der Annahme und Übermittlung von Aufträgen, jeweils hinsichtlich Finanzinstrumenten, zu erbringen. FINAD ist nicht berechtigt, Dienstleistungen zu erbringen, die das Halten von Geld, Wertpapieren oder sonstigen Instrumenten von Kunden umfassen. FINAD unterliegt der Aufsicht der Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA – www.fma.gv.at). Beschwerden über die FINAD können an die FMA gerichtet werden. FINAD Family Office GmbH, Wien, ist eine Unternehmensberatung. FINAD GmbH und FINAD Family Office GmbH sind nicht zur Ausübung der Rechtsanwaltschaft oder der Steuerberatung oder Wirtschaftsprüfung berechtigt. © Copyright Finad AG – alle Rechte vorbehalten. 8
PETER AHLUWALIA Chief Investment Officer I Partner peter.ahluwalia@swisspartners.com As you will see below we increased our equity allocation slightly having moved from a somewhat neutral stance but is was not an earth shattering move. We remain very modestly overweight the technology sector. We did get hurt by our tilt towards consumer discretionary in March (autos) but held our nerve believing in the individual companies. We have no airlines but have 1 insurance company and 1 oil company which we do not view as risky bets. We are not taking any big bets via individual companies and we recently sold our high yield exposure on the recovery. For the next 18 months I expect significantly higher returns (read strong double digits) as the secular bull market needs to make up significant ground versus other secular bulls. What have we learned - the only expert is the virus itself. Nobody really knows but everbody has an opinion.
It is important to disassociate our our human instincts from the market- as individuals we are scared of a second wave but economies are unlikely to be closed again. I expect a v shaped recovery in terms of economic growth, employment numbers and earnings. To be realistic we will not get to the same levels as early 2020 but that is actually good news as it means the glide path for the recovery will be longer into next year supported by increasing fiscal and monetary policy. I am not concerned about valuation as in Jan 1922 the S&P was at 22.58x, in 1934 at 23.73x, 1993 at 22.50x, 2002 at 46.17x and 2009 at 70.91x. We would start leaning into risk more (equities, developed mkts cyclical) on further softness although the market is likely to remain somewhat psychophrenic in the short term. I would not be suprised to see the cyclical, value, Europe and small cap areas outperform if I am right regarding the recovery however this does not mean secular growth cannot increase (albeit at a lower rate). The only certain bet is that COVID19 won`t be with us forever. My gut instinct is that it will get less important as markets get bored like the previous North Korea headlines.
Aquila Independent, disciplined, transparent. And a touch more personal. July 2020 |
Part I § Increase frequency of meetings (being honest, this doesn‘t necessarily improve decisions…) § Underweight equities since last year, overweight US and underweight Europe played out well, overweight Tech/Megatrends was positive as well, infrastructure theme was underperforming § We underestimated the determination, the speed and scale of central bank interventions § We increased exposure to Gold Ø We consider Gold as a „better currency“, not as an investment! § We increased exposure to Gold stocks Ø We consider Gold stocks as an strategic investment 2 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich
Part II: Actions taken § Bottom of the recession Ø April : No major changes (stayed overweight Swiss equites and US, underweight Europe and EM), overweight converts § May/June Ø We think, it‘s not the beginning of a new business cycle. It‘s the attempt of central banks, to establish a new regime of „agressively managed markets“ Ø May: Reduced EM equities, EM Debt and Gold à increase High Yield and Gold Miners § Role of Technology Ø Tech has always been part of our thematic investment bucket in the total asset allocation. Since 2016 we are invested in our AMC that covers 6 megatrends of which one is Tech § Share of risky assets… Ø EM Debt neutral / Hy neutral / Equities small underweight, slightly underweight small caps / no private equity / still overweight convertibles 3 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich
Part III: Expectations § Key learnings? Ø We may be in a different investment regime with managed markets / central banks buying «everything»; Road to serfom Ø Lower required rate of return in the new «managed markets regime»? • Question still unsolved • Risk of «overlearning» very high, therefore… • …still unclear, if we just saw the «mother of all bear market rallys» or permanently lower required rates / asset price targets Ø Further Research (& Entertainment J): • Blogpost Managed Markets: https://www.aquila.ch/blog/managed-markets/ (German) • https://www.aquila.ch/en/blog/managed-markets/ (English) • https://www.aquila.ch/blog/der-pawlowsche-hund/ (German only) § What are your 3 most important postions on your conviction list Ø Convertibles (positive performance YTD!) Ø Gold Ø Tech and Healthcare (equity sectors) 4 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich
5 1984 1984 1985 1986 1986 1987 1988 goldprice 1988 1989 1990 1990 1991 1992 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich 1992 1993 1994 1994 1995 1996 1996 1997 1998 1998 1999 2000 2000 2001 2002 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 2006 2006 2007 2008 2008 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 2012 2013 2014 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 2018 «Philadelphia Stock Exchange Gold and Silver Index» divided through 2018 2019 2020 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
Reference Portfolio CHF Balanced Tactical Asset Allocation Strategic Asset Allocation Bands Current Liquidity 10.5 10 0 - 25 Fixed Income 31 35 20 - 60 Government 12 Investment Grade Corporates 6 High Yield 2 Emerging Market Debt 3 Various 8 Equities 44.5 45 35 - 60 Switzerland 10 Switzerland Small / Mid Cap 4.5 Europe 4 United States 8 Japan 5 Emerging Markets 7 Thematic 6 Other Investments 14 10 0 - 30 Gold 9 Commodity 0 Real Estate 3 Various 2 Total 100 100 100 6 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich
Disclaimer Produced by Investment Center Aquila Ltd. The information and opinions contained in this document are based on sources that we consider to be reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot vouch either for the reliability or for the correctness or completeness of these sources. This information and these opinions constitute neither a request nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell investment instruments or to conduct any other transactions. We strongly recommend that prospective investors consult their independent financial advisor before making decisions based on this document in order to ensure that their personal investment objectives, financial situation, individual needs and risk profile and any additional information provided in comprehensive advice are properly considered. 7 | Aquila Ltd., Bahnhofstrasse 43, 8001 Zurich
1 – March 23 until now For direct lines : Mainly tech companies were hit like the market and after rebound Google, Tesla doing the massive rebound Tencent with delay On credit side : Hit by MSC Cruise For credit Fund : Quiet defensive style except one emerging debt fund Still overweight Tech and the rest is mainly MSCI World European Credit not yet recover their loss neither a alternative investment link to the put option No We were defensive in February (not due Covid but valuation) We were more optimist in April (To negative view on Covid Compare to Sras) Now : Still optimist thank to massive injection in US, Europe, Japan, etc…politics wants to keep the economy over the water and ready to anything needed 1
2 – Actions from the bottom 40% Equities in January, 36% February, 30% begin March, 24% March 9 28% end March, 35% mid April, 42% now We double our tactical certificated (goal : beating MSCI World) Technology : Nasdaq 10% and recently adding 4% ARKK (innovation tech ETF) Risky : close to 0 for Equities European High yield still invested with very cautious fund manager : 30% Reducing Global High Yield from 5% to 0%, prefer equities Golds : 10%, cash : between 5 to 25% (average 12%) 2
3 – Post Pandemics +5% for S&P end year and close to 0 for Europe then still 10 to 15% up Most probably before US election Shaky market Key learning : Market is not a exact science, Equities are still one of the best asset classes Fixed Income (G4) : low win, avoid losing a lot. Top position: Cash, Gold, MSCI World Equities, European Credit. 3
Part 1 • Our Portfolios are mainly built out of Health Care, Consumer Staples, Tech and some Cyclicals and Insurance companies. The defensive side was o.k. The cyclical part obviously not. We sell volatility premium for our clients. Therefore this part was also heavily affected. Spreads of our bonds widened significantly. • We sold our protection and increased risk by taking advantage of the very high implied vol. • We were right but acted too early.
Part 2 • As mentioned before we added to our equity exposure (by selling put options on large names). • We sold options especially on technology companies and some industrials. • It’s a large sector in our portfolios and we’re concentrated apart from BABA on Europe & USA. We are more focussed on the FAANG, Semis and some Software names and avoid some fancy digital names. • We think Value is a theme which has more room to go, but it’s heavily dependent on the Covid-19 curve (and more fiscal help). Materials, energy & insurance are more interesting than travel & leisure. On the bonds we’ve a preference for the hybrid bonds. Relatively hybrids are cheap and give us an inflation protection. We keep those weights the same.
Part 3 • Next 18 months. Fiscal and monetary stimulus is huge, so return potential for the risky assets is still quite high. 18’000 billions stimulus in a world where world equities account for 80’000 billions & world Bonds account for 100’000 billions. But we also reopened some Corona hedges. • Markets adapt very rapidly to the cirumstances. Being early might be better than being too late. Markets developments might well be exteme on both sides, therefore diversified Portfolios with some downside protection still makes a lot of sence. • Microsoft, Alibaba and Axa
Sie können auch lesen